ARKA-AI
Sign InEarly Access
Model Comparison

Gemini 2.0 Flash vs Llama 3.1 405B

Which AI model is right for you?

Compare Gemini 2.0 Flash and Llama 3.1 405B across reasoning, speed, writing, coding, and cost. Find the best fit for your workflow or let ARKAbrain choose automatically.

Get Founding AccessSee How ARKAbrain Works

Quick Verdict

Choose Gemini 2.0 Flash for:

  • Real-time applications
  • Multimodal tasks
  • Agentic workflows
  • High-volume processing

Google's latest fast model with multimodal and agentic capabilities.

Choose Llama 3.1 405B for:

  • Complex reasoning
  • Code generation
  • Research tasks
  • Privacy-focused use

Meta's powerful open-source model rivaling proprietary solutions.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Gemini 2.0 Flash

Reasoning
Good
Speed
Excellent
Writing
Good
Coding
Good
Cost Efficiency
Excellent

Llama 3.1 405B

Reasoning
Excellent
Speed
Moderate
Writing
Excellent
Coding
Excellent
Cost Efficiency
Moderate

Ratings are qualitative assessments based on general capabilities. Actual performance may vary by task and context.

When to Use Gemini 2.0 Flash

Gemini 2.0 Flash is Google's newest generation model optimized for speed while supporting multimodal inputs, native tool use, and agentic workflows.

Strengths

  • Very fast
  • Multimodal native
  • Tool use support
  • Agentic capabilities

Considerations

  • Newer model
  • May have different behaviors than 1.5

When to Use Llama 3.1 405B

Llama 3.1 405B is Meta's previous flagship open-source model, offering performance that rivals proprietary alternatives. With 405 billion parameters, it excels at complex reasoning and coding.

Strengths

  • Near-frontier performance
  • Open-source flexibility
  • Strong reasoning
  • Excellent coding

Considerations

  • Higher inference cost
  • Requires powerful hosting

How ARKAbrain Decides

Instead of choosing between Gemini 2.0 Flash and Llama 3.1 405B yourself, ARKAbrain analyzes each request to determine the optimal model. Simple tasks route to efficient models. Complex reasoning goes to more capable ones. You get the best results at the best cost—automatically.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Gemini 2.0 Flash vs Llama 3.1 405B

It depends on your use case. Gemini 2.0 Flash excels at real-time applications and multimodal tasks, while Llama 3.1 405B is better for complex reasoning and code generation. ARKAbrain can automatically select the best model for each request.
Cost-effectiveness depends on your usage patterns. Gemini 2.0 Flash offers competitive pricing. With ARKA-AI's BYOK model, you pay only for actual usage.
Yes! With ARKA-AI, you can add API keys for multiple providers. ARKAbrain automatically routes each request to the optimal model based on the task, so you get the best of both.
Gemini 2.0 Flash. For simple queries, faster models are selected automatically. For complex reasoning, more thorough models are chosen.
ARKAbrain analyzes your request to determine task complexity, required capabilities, and optimal cost-quality tradeoff. It then routes to the best available model from your configured providers.

Explore Related Content

Stop choosing. Start working.

Let ARKAbrain handle model selection while you focus on what matters—getting great results.

Get Founding Access
BYOK: You stay in control
No token bundles
Cancel anytime
7-day refund on first payment